It will be interesting to see. What will we become?of project sponsors or part of the community …
3 Likes
Good idea. I total support this proposal.
3 Likes
Поддерживаю! Готов проголосовать
1 Like
Great Idea! The price was too high for LBP supporters, this proposal would really helpful for them.
3 Likes
This will be a healthy and successful distribution of tokens. The best way to decentralize. If people have already invested their funds, they believe in the project.
4 Likes
I, as a Radicle token holder, vote to distribute unsold tokens to those who participated in the sale on Balancer. Great job keep it up!
3 Likes
The supporting info/data is simply that 4% were determined to be the correct number to be distributed to the community in the first place by whoever decided 4% should be in the LBP pool.
1 Like
Good proposal!! This is best decision how to use unsold tokens
4 Likes
I don’t agree, there is no reason it has to be complicated. Distribution proportional to USDC contribution is quick and easy, and distributing the remainder of the tokens has the exact same benefits as the LBP did.
2 Likes
Great idea and I fully support it.
The team can guess by itself that those token holders who are left now after the LBP are most likely early followers and supporters of the project, and not just speculators. Therefore, I would vote for the distribution of unsold tokens to current token holders, even with a large lock or vesting.
4 Likes
I am very strong holder an believer and therefore support this proposal. Sure that the hands of early adopters are incredibly strong.
4 Likes
I am in. Total support
4 Likes
I agree with this proposal. You have my full support.
2 Likes
The voting of the content below has begun.
Why isn’t there a vote on this proposal?
============================
Due to popular demand, there is now a Snapshot proposal to unpause swapping on the Balancer LBP pool 
This is to provide more RAD liquidity in the short-term while a formal proposal is moved through official governance.
Voting will last for 24hrs 
2 Likes
In order for this article to be an official proposal, it must be registered as a “DISCUSSION”. I registered this content in a “DISCUSSION”, so please give us feedback in the comments.
2 Likes
@kit, In order for this article to be an official proposal, it must be registered as a “DISCUSSION”. So please change the category of this article to “DISCUSSION”
1 Like
Yes please. As @dhejrdlf1 said, @kit let’s change the title of this topic to [DISCUSSION] so this can be formally escalated & evaluated in the current governance process.
Please also reformat the title to be an “general, non-biased question about a potential change, improvement, or action”. For example: “Should the remaining RAD and USDC balances from the LBP event be distributed amongst LBP contributors?”
Once that is completed, we can source more official discussion here, and even start a Snapshot poll to gather community sentiment.
Thanks!
I have edited it, but I don’t recall seeing a discussion thread about the proposal to move the unsold tokens into the treasury
3 Likes
@abbey @kit modified the category of the article to “DISCUSSION”
When will there be a snapshot of this topic?
1 Like
@kit you must choose “DISCUSSION” CATEGORY
