Thanks for the clarification here @bordumb !
I don’t think we have to make a new Temperature Check, as it seems everyone is behind the concept of the proposal and we are just trying to figure out the details before moving it through into the final stage. I think those who contributed to this thread (@lftherios, @cloudhead, @niloconthecob) should review the revised compensation breakdown and see if it addresses their concerns. If so, I propose we create a new Snapshot poll starting Monday, November 5th with this updated Compensation breakdown.
I believe having a separate compensation multi-sig governed by a *Compensation Committee (as @niloconthecob put it) should definitely be a next step for our governance system following this proposal (and was sort of the plan). The group should focus on transparently managing compensation & contributor relationships within the Radicle Governance network.
I believe this multi-sig should be run by the Radicle Governance Working Group (and one person to represent the Radicle Foundation perhaps?) as it’s made up of the community contributors who are coordinating and facilitating most governance activities at the moment.
I’ll prioritize putting together a Temperature Check outlining this structure and we can continue the discussion next week. I believe we can keep moving the Grants Program through as long as we’re pulling our concerns around managing compensation and driving them into the discussion of this upcoming Temperature Check.
Thanks all! 